232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE

The New York Times vs The Guardian

The New York Times's policy answers the question and is graded F. The Guardian's doesn't say either way. That's a finding about the document, not a worse grade.

Grades read the plan most people are on. Each company's full entry has every plan, every clause and the archived copy it was read from.

The New York Times

The New York Times says information it collects may be used to train AI models — including recordings of your chats with its support staff.

Verdict
F
By default
Trains on you by default
The way out
No opt-out in the policy
What F means
On by default, with no way out on the plan you are on — and nothing short of reading the terms would have told you.
Last checked
5 Oct 2026
Read the full verdict →

The Guardian

The Guardian says it may use generative AI on personal data, and points to principles held on another page. What it may build from that data, this document does not say.

Verdict
By default
The policy does not say
The way out
Nothing to opt out of on the record
Last checked
5 Oct 2026
Read the full verdict →

The New York Times: every plan

All accounts and subscriptionsTRAINS: YES
OPT-OUT
None offered
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
88 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED
Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW
Unknown

The Guardian: every plan

All readers and account holdersUNCLEAR
OPT-OUT
Not established
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
—
DE-IDENTIFIED
—
HUMAN REVIEW
Not established

Every grade on this page is the one on the company's own entry, read from a dated, archived copy of its policy. Nothing here is computed separately. How grades are set · All comparisons