· productivity

Jasper vs Copy.ai

On what the policies say, Copy.ai is the better choice for your data: graded B against Jasper's F.

Grades read the plan most people are on. Each company's full entry has every plan, every clause and the archived copy it was read from.

Jasper

Jasper's terms let it use your inputs and outputs to develop its AI models on Creator and Pro. Only users in the EU or UK are offered a way to object. Business plans are excluded by contract.

Verdict

By default: Trains on you by default
The way out: No opt-out in the policy
What F means: On by default, with no way out on the plan you are on — and nothing short of reading the terms would have told you.
Last checked: 5 Oct 2026

Read the full verdict →

Copy.ai

Copy.ai's security page says "We don't train on your data": your prompts and ideas are not used to train its models. The privacy policy leaves the question to that page.

Verdict

By default: Does not train on you by default
The way out: No opt-out in the policy
What B means: Off by default. Training happens only if you opt in, or not at all.
Last checked: 5 Oct 2026

Read the full verdict →

Jasper: every plan

Jasper · what each plan can refuse · checked 5 Oct 2026

2 PLANS

Plan

Exposure

Trains

Opt-out path

Retention

De-identified

Human review

Creator and Pro

89 / 100

YES

None offered

Not stated

Unknown

How the score is made89 / 100 · the rubric

Default50 / 50

On by default, with no way out on this plan

Way out33 / 33

No route to refuse is stated

Paywall0 / 4

No paywall on the control

Scope2 / 4

3 kinds of data are in scope

Human review2 / 4

The policy does not say whether people read it

De-identified2 / 2

Nothing is said about de-identification

Business

20 / 100

Nothing to switch off

Not stated

Unknown

How the score is made20 / 100 · the rubric

Default14 / 50

Off by default

Way out0 / 33

Nothing is on, so nothing needs refusing

Paywall0 / 4

No paywall on the control

Scope2 / 4

3 kinds of data are in scope

Human review2 / 4

The policy does not say whether people read it

De-identified2 / 2

Nothing is said about de-identification

EVERY CELL ABOVE IS SOURCED FROM A QUOTED CLAUSE OR A DOCUMENTED SEARCH · SEE THE EVIDENCE ABOVE

EXPOSURE IS SCORED 0–100 ON ONE AXIS, HOW HARD IT IS TO STOP THIS PLAN TRAINING ON YOU. THE GRADE IS THE BAND IT FALLS IN: A 0–10 · B 11–25 · C 26–45 · D 46–60 · E 61–80 · F 81–100. HOW THE SCORE IS SET

Creator and ProTRAINS: YES

OPT-OUT: None offered
RETENTION: Not stated
EXPOSURE: 89 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED: Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW: Unknown

BusinessTRAINS: NO

OPT-OUT: Nothing to switch off
RETENTION: Not stated
EXPOSURE: 20 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED: Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW: Unknown

Copy.ai: every plan

Copy.ai · what each plan can refuse · checked 5 Oct 2026

1 PLAN

Plan

Exposure

Trains

Opt-out path

Retention

De-identified

Human review

All accounts

19 / 100

Nothing to switch off

Not stated

Unknown

How the score is made19 / 100 · the rubric

Default14 / 50

Off by default

Way out0 / 33

Nothing is on, so nothing needs refusing

Paywall0 / 4

No paywall on the control

Scope1 / 4

2 kinds of data are in scope

Human review2 / 4

The policy does not say whether people read it

De-identified2 / 2

Nothing is said about de-identification

EVERY CELL ABOVE IS SOURCED FROM A QUOTED CLAUSE OR A DOCUMENTED SEARCH · SEE THE EVIDENCE ABOVE

All accountsTRAINS: NO

OPT-OUT: Nothing to switch off
RETENTION: Not stated
EXPOSURE: 19 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED: Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW: Unknown

Every grade on this page is the one on the company's own entry, read from a dated, archived copy of its policy. Nothing here is computed separately. How grades are set · All comparisons