232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 5 OCT 2026 · 1 CLAUSES ON FILE
ai-assistants

Does Manus train on your data?

Manus's policy now says de-identified data made from your personal information may be used "to develop and improve our models", with an opt-out by email in some places. Manus is being written to.

LAST CHECKED
5 Oct 2026 · 5 days ago
CONFIDENCE
unclear
RIGHT OF REPLY
Asked · no reply
Verdict
No clause on file

Evidence 1 — All accounts
Privacy Policy · All accounts
EVIDENCE 01 OF 01

This clause is real, but it doesn't resolve the training question - see the finding below.

"We may make personal information into de-identified and/or anonymized data by removing information that makes the data identifiable to you. We may use such data to analyze, improve, develop and protect the Service, including to develop and improve our models and related technologies."
CHECKED
1 Oct 2026
STILL LIVE AS OF
5 Oct 2026
APPLIES TO
All accounts
JURISDICTION
global
HOW IT WAS TAKEN
Fetched, browser-rendered
SHA-256
77635945…D880

Why this is still UNCLEAR: Manus's privacy policy, revised 28 September 2026, now answers part of the question. Personal information turned into "de-identified and/or anonymized" data may be used "to analyze, improve, develop and protect the Service, including to develop and improve our models and related technologies". The same paragraph adds: "Depending on your jurisdiction, you may opt out by contacting us at the email address provided below." Which jurisdictions, it doesn't say. The deletion section mentions content that's been de-identified "when you allow us to use your content to improve our models". That reads like a setting, and the policy doesn't name it or say which way it ships. Prompts still go to third-party AI providers, who "may infer information about you". The entry stays UNCLEAR while Manus is asked about the setting, because this site writes to a company before it publishes an adverse finding about it.

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

All accountsUNCLEAR
OPT-OUT
Not established
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
—
DE-IDENTIFIED
—
HUMAN REVIEW
Not established

How to opt out of Manus AI training

Plan by plan, from what Manus's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

All accounts

Not graded, so no route is pointed at. Manus's privacy policy, revised 28 September 2026, now answers part of the question. Personal information turned into "de-identified and/or anonymized" data may be used "to analyze, improve, develop and protect the Service, including to develop and improve our models and related technologies". The same paragraph adds: "Depending on your jurisdiction, you may opt out by contacting us at the email address provided below." Which jurisdictions, it doesn't say. The deletion section mentions content that's been de-identified "when you allow us to use your content to improve our models". That reads like a setting, and the policy doesn't name it or say which way it ships. Prompts still go to third-party AI providers, who "may infer information about you". The entry stays UNCLEAR while Manus is asked about the setting, because this site writes to a company before it publishes an adverse finding about it.

Each step's source and archived copy →

What this policy has done since we started watching

3 CAPTURES SINCE 6 SEPT 2026

1 change detected since 6 Sept 2026. Each one is a diff between two archived copies, and each links to the passage that moved.

  1. MajorTouched jurisdiction, opt-outs, retention, what's collected, sub-processors, plan tiers and training.

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policyquoted
1 Oct 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

We wrote to Manus on 11 Sept 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.

Report a wrong clause

Writing about Manus? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.