Does Replit train on your data?
Replit's blog says public Repls are used for AI training, anonymised; the terms and privacy policy do not say so. This entry is being re-graded on that sentence, and Replit is being written to.
This clause is real, but it doesn't resolve the training question - see the finding below.
"As already mentioned in past blog posts , we only use public Repls for analytics and AI training: any user code that's not public - including all enterprise accounts - is not reviewed."
- 1 Oct 2026
- 5 Oct 2026
- Individual accounts (public Repls)
- global
- Fetched from the company
- 8C0688C2…0632
Why this is still UNCLEAR: The privacy policy and terms of 3 August 2026 still contain no training statement. A company blog post, published August 2024 and updated July 2025, does: only public Repls are used for analytics and AI training, private code is not reviewed, and public code is anonymised first; the Teams and Commercial Agreement excludes business customers' content by contract. That answers the question this site asks, and the entry is being re-graded on it. The grade is not shown yet because this site writes to a company before it publishes an adverse finding about it; the entry updates once Replit has had its right of reply.
What each plan can refuse
The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.
- Not established
- Not stated
- —
- —
- Not established
How to opt out of Replit AI training
Plan by plan, from what Replit's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.
Individual accounts (public Repls)
Not graded, so no route is pointed at. The privacy policy and terms of 3 August 2026 still contain no training statement. A company blog post, published August 2024 and updated July 2025, does: only public Repls are used for analytics and AI training, private code is not reviewed, and public code is anonymised first; the Teams and Commercial Agreement excludes business customers' content by contract. That answers the question this site asks, and the entry is being re-graded on it. The grade is not shown yet because this site writes to a company before it publishes an adverse finding about it; the entry updates once Replit has had its right of reply.
What this policy has done since we started watching
No change detected. We've held a copy of Replit's documents since 13 Aug 2026 and re-read them since, across 8 captures of 5 documents. The text hasn't moved in a way that touches this verdict. That's a fact about the documents, and it's only knowable by having kept the earlier copies.
Everything we read
Vendor response
We haven't yet written to Replit about this verdict, and they haven't disputed, clarified or announced a change to any clause quoted above. When either happens it's published here, word for word.
Report a wrong clause