Does Devin train on your data?
Cognition says it may use your content to train the models behind Devin — but makes it conditional on terms the policy doesn't reproduce.
This clause is real, but it doesn't resolve the training question - see the finding below.
"To customize your experience with our Services and otherwise improve our Services including, depending on the terms that apply to your use of the Services, using User Content to train, fine tune and improve the models that power our Services."
- 7 Sept 2026
- 5 Oct 2026
- All plans
- global
- Fetched from the company
- 5DFE8010…306F
Why this is still UNCLEAR: Training is stated as a purpose and then qualified into ambiguity: User Content is used to train and fine-tune the models "depending on the terms that apply to your use of the Services". Which terms apply to an ordinary account, and what they say about training, is not in this document and not in a source this monitor archives. So the policy establishes that training happens for some users on some terms, and leaves you unable to tell whether you are one of them.
What each plan can refuse
The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.
- Not established
- Not stated
- —
- —
- Not established
How to opt out of Devin AI training
Plan by plan, from what Devin's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.
All plans
Not graded, so no route is pointed at. Training is stated as a purpose and then qualified into ambiguity: User Content is used to train and fine-tune the models "depending on the terms that apply to your use of the Services". Which terms apply to an ordinary account, and what they say about training, is not in this document and not in a source this monitor archives. So the policy establishes that training happens for some users on some terms, and leaves you unable to tell whether you are one of them.
What this policy has done since we started watching
1 change detected since 14 Aug 2026. Each one is a diff between two archived copies, and each links to the passage that moved.
Vendor response
We wrote to Devin (Cognition) on 24 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.
Report a wrong clause