232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 1 SEPT 2026 · 0 CLAUSES ON FILE
comms

Does Telegram train on your data?

Telegram's privacy policy never states whether your content is used to train AI models. This is a documented absence, not an unread document.

LAST CHECKED
1 Sept 2026 · 1 month ago
CONFIDENCE
unclear
RIGHT OF REPLY
Not yet asked
Verdict
No clause on file

Evidence 1 — All accounts
All accounts · No clause located
EVIDENCE 01 OF 01
UNCLEAR — THE POLICY DOES NOT PERMIT A DETERMINATION

Telegram's privacy policy contains no form of the word "train", no "machine learning" and no "artificial intelligence" anywhere in the capture, on 13 Aug and again on 24 Aug. For a messaging service that describes its data handling in some detail, the complete absence of AI-training language is itself the finding: there is no permission to train stated, and no commitment not to. One thing did change on 24 Aug, and it bears on this. The policy used to say "Unlike other services, we don't use your data for ad targeting or other commercial purposes" — a sweeping assurance a reader could reasonably have read as covering model training. Both no-ads sentences survive, but narrowed, and not identically. The principles section now says "We don't use the contents of any of your chats or contact lists to show you ads"; the no-ads section says "we don't use the contents of your private chats or contacts lists for ad targeting or other commercial purposes". The second is the one that reached beyond advertising, and it now reaches only private chats: the contents of public groups and channels have left the "other commercial purposes" assurance, and everything that is not chat content at all — usage metadata, device information — was never inside it. A new section serves ads on the basis of Telegram's "legitimate interest". Nothing was added about training either way. (This entry previously rendered both narrowings as a single phrase, "the contents of your chats or contact lists", which neither sentence says; corrected 1 September 2026.)

DOCUMENTS READ
Telegram privacy policy, captured 2026-08-13 (https://telegram.org/privacy)
SEARCHED
train, training, trains, fine-tune, machine learning, artificial intelligence, AI model, large language model
MATCHES IN AI-TRAINING CONTEXT
0
CHECKED
1 Sept 2026

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

All accountsUNCLEAR
OPT-OUT
Not established
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
—
DE-IDENTIFIED
—
HUMAN REVIEW
Not established

How to opt out of Telegram AI training

Plan by plan, from what Telegram's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

All accounts

Not graded, so no route is pointed at. Telegram's privacy policy contains no form of the word "train", no "machine learning" and no "artificial intelligence" anywhere in the capture, on 13 Aug and again on 24 Aug. For a messaging service that describes its data handling in some detail, the complete absence of AI-training language is itself the finding: there is no permission to train stated, and no commitment not to. One thing did change on 24 Aug, and it bears on this. The policy used to say "Unlike other services, we don't use your data for ad targeting or other commercial purposes" — a sweeping assurance a reader could reasonably have read as covering model training. Both no-ads sentences survive, but narrowed, and not identically. The principles section now says "We don't use the contents of any of your chats or contact lists to show you ads"; the no-ads section says "we don't use the contents of your private chats or contacts lists for ad targeting or other commercial purposes". The second is the one that reached beyond advertising, and it now reaches only private chats: the contents of public groups and channels have left the "other commercial purposes" assurance, and everything that is not chat content at all — usage metadata, device information — was never inside it. A new section serves ads on the basis of Telegram's "legitimate interest". Nothing was added about training either way. (This entry previously rendered both narrowings as a single phrase, "the contents of your chats or contact lists", which neither sentence says; corrected 1 September 2026.)

Each step's source and archived copy →

What this policy has done since we started watching

4 CAPTURES SINCE 13 AUG 2026

3 changes detected since 13 Aug 2026. Each one is a diff between two archived copies, and each links to the passage that moved.

  1. NotableTouched jurisdiction, opt-outs, retention, what's collected and sub-processors.
  2. MinorTouched retention and what's collected. Not yet reviewed by a human.
  3. MinorTouched retention and what's collected. Not yet reviewed by a human.

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policy
24 Aug 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

We haven't yet written to Telegram about this verdict, and they haven't disputed, clarified or announced a change to any clause quoted above. When either happens it's published here, word for word.

Report a wrong clause

Compared with Signal · Writing about Telegram? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.