232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 5 OCT 2026 · 1 CLAUSES ON FILE
comms

Does Loom train on your data?

Loom lists machine learning and AI model training among the ways it develops and improves the service. No opt-out is stated.

LAST CHECKED
5 Oct 2026 · 5 days ago
CONFIDENCE
high
RIGHT OF REPLY
Asked · no reply
Verdict
F
Trains on you by default
No opt-out found in this policy

Evidence 1 — All plans
Privacy Policy · All plans
EVIDENCE 01 OF 01
"To develop and improve the Services, including machine learning and artificial intelligence model training;"
CHECKED
7 Sept 2026
STILL LIVE AS OF
5 Oct 2026
APPLIES TO
All plans
JURISDICTION
global
HOW IT WAS TAKEN
Fetched from the company
SHA-256
81A74B8E…4DD3

How we read it: The clause appears as one item in a list of service-improvement purposes rather than as a dedicated AI section, and it does not say which inputs are covered — recordings, transcripts, or usage data. Graded on the plain reading that model training is among the stated purposes. The policy states the training use and is silent on how to refuse it. Searched this capture for an AI-training control: the opt-out language it does contain covers marketing email, analytics and US state-privacy disclosures, none of which touch model training. Loom is Atlassian-owned and this is Atlassian's policy, so that verdict's finding applies here: the objection right exists, gated to the EEA and UK.

CONTROLS SEARCHED FOR · 19 Aug 2026

opt out, object to, right to object, legitimate interest, restrict, settings

What the document does offer

  • the right to object to legitimate-interest processing — in a section opening "If you are an individual in the European Economic Area (EEA) or United Kingdom (UK)", warning it "may mean no longer using the Services"
  • "how you can object to certain uses of information about you", the policy's own summary of that right
  • control or opt out of cookies and tracking technologies, per the Cookies & Tracking Notice
  • opt out of promotional communications, in the message or in account settings
  • opt out of certain disclosures of personal information and targeted advertising, under US state laws

Why none of it applies: Same document, same finding as the Atlassian verdict: the only control reaching model training is the objection right, and the policy bounds it by geography rather than by plan. Nothing outside the EEA and UK undoes the clause quoted here, which is what this grade records.

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

All plansTRAINS: YES
OPT-OUT
None offered
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
87 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED
Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW
Unknown

How to opt out of Loom AI training

Plan by plan, from what Loom's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

All plans

No opt-out is stated in the policy on file for Loom.

Each step's source and archived copy →

What this policy has done since we started watching

2 CAPTURES SINCE 13 AUG 2026

No change detected. We've held a copy of Loom's policy since 13 Aug 2026 and re-read it since, across 2 captures. The text hasn't moved in a way that touches this verdict. That's a fact about the document, and it's only knowable by having kept the earlier copies.

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policyquoted
7 Sept 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

We wrote to Loom on 27 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.

Report a wrong clause

Writing about Loom? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.