232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 7 OCT 2026 · 0 CLAUSES ON FILE
finance

Does Wells Fargo train on your data?

Wells Fargo's notice of data collection runs to 22,000 characters and mentions AI, machine learning and model training exactly zero times.

LAST CHECKED
7 Oct 2026 · 4 days ago
CONFIDENCE
medium
RIGHT OF REPLY
Asked · no reply
Verdict
No clause on file

Evidence 1 — All customers
All customers · No clause located
EVIDENCE 01 OF 01
UNCLEAR — THE POLICY DOES NOT PERMIT A DETERMINATION

Both occurrences of "training" in the document are employment records — staff work history and HR service providers — and there is no "machine learning", no "artificial intelligence" and no "model" anywhere. The same silence as Chase, Citi and Bank of America, at the same scale, which is what makes the American incumbents a set rather than a coincidence. Re-read on 7 October 2026 in the revision of 13 August 2026: still silent.

DOCUMENTS READ
Wells Fargo privacy notice, captured 2026-10-05 (https://www.wellsfargo.com/privacy-security/notice-of-data-collection/)
SEARCHED
train, training, fine-tune, machine learning, artificial intelligence, model
MATCHES IN AI-TRAINING CONTEXT
0 of 2 raw hits
CHECKED
7 Oct 2026

Both "training" matches are employment context: staff work history and personnel files, and HR service providers such as recruiting and training vendors. Neither is model training.

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

All customersUNCLEAR
OPT-OUT
Not established
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
—
DE-IDENTIFIED
—
HUMAN REVIEW
Not established

How to opt out of Wells Fargo AI training

Plan by plan, from what Wells Fargo's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

All customers

Not graded, so no route is pointed at. Both occurrences of "training" in the document are employment records — staff work history and HR service providers — and there is no "machine learning", no "artificial intelligence" and no "model" anywhere. The same silence as Chase, Citi and Bank of America, at the same scale, which is what makes the American incumbents a set rather than a coincidence. Re-read on 7 October 2026 in the revision of 13 August 2026: still silent.

Each step's source and archived copy →

What this policy has done since we started watching

4 CAPTURES SINCE 17 AUG 2026

2 changes detected since 17 Aug 2026. Each one is a diff between two archived copies, and each links to the passage that moved.

  1. NotableTouched opt-outs, retention and sub-processors.
  2. NotableTouched opt-outs, sub-processors and training.

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policy
5 Oct 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

We wrote to Wells Fargo on 26 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.

Report a wrong clause

Writing about Wells Fargo? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.