232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 5 OCT 2026 · 1 CLAUSES ON FILE
fitness

Does Freeletics train on your data?

Freeletics trains its Coach+ assistant on fitness data and says it uses only aggregated or de-identified data to do it. It names no setting for staying out of that training set.

LAST CHECKED
5 Oct 2026 · 5 days ago
CONFIDENCE
high
RIGHT OF REPLY
Asked · no reply
Verdict
F
Trains on you by default
No opt-out found in this policy

Evidence 1 — All accounts
Privacy Policy · All accounts
EVIDENCE 01 OF 01
"When we train Coach+, we only use aggregated or de-identified fitness data."
CHECKED
7 Sept 2026
STILL LIVE AS OF
5 Oct 2026
APPLIES TO
All accounts
JURISDICTION
eu
HOW IT WAS TAKEN
Fetched from the company
SHA-256
CC62E650…D3F3

How we read it: Two things here are better than the grade suggests, and neither is a switch. The de-identification is categorical rather than hedged — "only aggregated or de-identified", where Strava says "where possible" and GitHub "where feasible" — and Freeletics binds its LLM partner to a "Zero-Retention/Zero Training Policy" covering queries and metrics. What the policy never offers is a way to keep your fitness data out of Coach+'s training set. F on this site is the no-opt-out grade, not a reading of intent. One question the document leaves open, and the one worth asking them: whether that training set draws on every user or only on those who choose to use Coach+.

CONTROLS SEARCHED FOR · 29 Aug 2026

opt out, opt-out, settings, withdraw, object, Coach+, consent

What the document does offer

  • consent controls over HealthKit and Google Health Connect imports — what Freeletics may collect, not what it may train on
  • privacy settings governing what other users can see of your profile and training data
  • account deletion, which removes results and progress rather than withdrawing past training contributions

Why none of it applies: Every control the policy names sits upstream of the training clause or beside it: what is collected, and who else can see it. Nothing addresses Coach+'s training set, and the de-identification is offered in place of a choice rather than alongside one.

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

All accountsTRAINS: YES
OPT-OUT
None offered
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
84 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED
Yes, stated
HUMAN REVIEW
Unknown

How to opt out of Freeletics AI training

Plan by plan, from what Freeletics's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

All accounts

No opt-out is stated in the policy on file for Freeletics.

Each step's source and archived copy →

What this policy has done since we started watching

2 CAPTURES SINCE 29 AUG 2026

No change detected. We've held a copy of Freeletics's policy since 29 Aug 2026 and re-read it since, across 2 captures. The text hasn't moved in a way that touches this verdict. That's a fact about the document, and it's only knowable by having kept the earlier copies.

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policyquoted
7 Sept 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

We wrote to Freeletics on 31 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.

Report a wrong clause

Writing about Freeletics? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.