232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 5 OCT 2026 · 1 CLAUSES ON FILE
fitness

Does MyFitnessPal train on your data?

MyFitnessPal names machine learning and artificial intelligence once, as tools it uses to improve the Services. Whether your food and exercise logs train a model, it never says.

LAST CHECKED
5 Oct 2026 · 5 days ago
CONFIDENCE
unclear
RIGHT OF REPLY
Clarified
Verdict
No clause on file

Evidence 1 — All accounts (free and Premium)
Privacy Policy · All accounts (free and Premium)
EVIDENCE 01 OF 01

This clause is real, but it doesn't resolve the training question - see the finding below.

"We use your personal information to improve and enhance our Services, including through the use of various technologies (e.g., business intelligence tools, machine learning systems, and artificial intelligence)"
CHECKED
7 Sept 2026
STILL LIVE AS OF
5 Oct 2026
APPLIES TO
All accounts (free and Premium)
JURISDICTION
global
HOW IT WAS TAKEN
Fetched from the company
SHA-256
7064337D…9D75

Why this is still UNCLEAR: The word "train" does not appear in this policy at all. "Machine learning" and "artificial intelligence" appear once each, in the sentence quoted, and they are named as technologies the company uses to improve and personalise the Services — not as things your data is used to build. That difference is the whole question, and the document does not close it: running an ML system over your food logs is not the same as putting those logs in a training set, and this policy never says which it means. MyFitnessPal replied on 10 September 2026, ten days after being asked: it "has not and is not using your personal information to train any proprietary models at this time". That would move this listing if it were published. It is not: the reply points back to the How We Use Personal Information section, which is the sentence quoted here, and the policy re-read live the same day still says only that machine learning and artificial intelligence are among the technologies used to improve the Services. Two hedges are recorded rather than held against anyone. "Proprietary models" leaves unaddressed the third-party model providers a product like this may send data to, and "at this time" describes the present without undertaking anything about the future. The reply is quoted in full above; the grade waits for the sentence to appear somewhere a customer can cite.

What MyFitnessPal said when we showed them this

Clarified10 Sept 2026
“Thank you for your question. MyFitnessPal uses tools like artificial intelligence and machine learning systems to enhance and personalize our Service. However, we have not and are not using your personal information to train any proprietary models at this time. For more information, please see the How We Use Personal Information section in our Privacy Policy.”

Printed exactly as it was sent, and unedited except where […] marks a cut. We've since asked a further question and are waiting on it - see the register.

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

All accounts (free and Premium)UNCLEAR
OPT-OUT
Not established
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
—
DE-IDENTIFIED
—
HUMAN REVIEW
Not established

How to opt out of MyFitnessPal AI training

Plan by plan, from what MyFitnessPal's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

All accounts (free and Premium)

Not graded, so no route is pointed at. The word "train" does not appear in this policy at all. "Machine learning" and "artificial intelligence" appear once each, in the sentence quoted, and they are named as technologies the company uses to improve and personalise the Services — not as things your data is used to build. That difference is the whole question, and the document does not close it: running an ML system over your food logs is not the same as putting those logs in a training set, and this policy never says which it means. MyFitnessPal replied on 10 September 2026, ten days after being asked: it "has not and is not using your personal information to train any proprietary models at this time". That would move this listing if it were published. It is not: the reply points back to the How We Use Personal Information section, which is the sentence quoted here, and the policy re-read live the same day still says only that machine learning and artificial intelligence are among the technologies used to improve the Services. Two hedges are recorded rather than held against anyone. "Proprietary models" leaves unaddressed the third-party model providers a product like this may send data to, and "at this time" describes the present without undertaking anything about the future. The reply is quoted in full above; the grade waits for the sentence to appear somewhere a customer can cite.

Each step's source and archived copy →

What this policy has done since we started watching

2 CAPTURES SINCE 29 AUG 2026

No change detected. We've held a copy of MyFitnessPal's policy since 29 Aug 2026 and re-read it since, across 2 captures. The text hasn't moved in a way that touches this verdict. That's a fact about the document, and it's only knowable by having kept the earlier copies.

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policyquoted
7 Sept 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

Clarified10 Sept 2026

Their reply is quoted in full at the top of this page.

We wrote back on 11 Sept 2026 with a question that's still open. It's listed on the register.

Report a wrong clause

Writing about MyFitnessPal? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.