232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 5 OCT 2026 · 2 CLAUSES ON FILE
dev

Does JetBrains train on your data?

JetBrains' AI terms undertake not to train on your code unless you expressly agree. The data sharing that feeds training is off by default on paid licences and on by default on free ones.

LAST CHECKED
5 Oct 2026 · 5 days ago
CONFIDENCE
high
RIGHT OF REPLY
Asked · no reply
Verdict
C
Trains on you by default
A self-serve opt-out exists

Evidence 1 — Paid and commercial licences
Terms of Service · Paid and commercial licences
EVIDENCE 01 OF 02
"We undertake that We will not use Your Inputs, Data, Outputs, and Suggestions to train any language models that generate code, text, or another type of data from which Your Inputs, Data, Outputs, or Suggestions could be extracted, unless You expressly agree to it."
CHECKED
10 Sept 2026
STILL LIVE AS OF
5 Oct 2026
APPLIES TO
Paid and commercial licences
JURISDICTION
global
HOW IT WAS TAKEN
Fetched from the company
SHA-256
1FE4120C…34C9

How we read it: Version 2.1 of the JetBrains AI Terms of Service, effective 30 September 2025. The express agreement is the IDE's detailed data collection setting, which the AI Assistant documentation says is disabled by default and, when on, collects the full communication with the model, "kept strictly confidential" and usable "for product improvement and training AI models". The terms also bind AI subcontractors to at least the same restriction. B because the switch exists and starts off; not A because it is an undertaking. JetBrains was written to on 2026-08-19 and did not reply; the answer was in its own terms.

Evidence 2 — Non-commercial (free) licences
AI Addendum · Non-commercial (free) licences
EVIDENCE 02 OF 02
"If you're using a non-commercial license, detailed code‐related data collection is enabled by default - you can disable it in the IDE settings via Settings | Appearance & Behavior | System Settings | Data Sharing ."
CHECKED
10 Sept 2026
STILL LIVE AS OF
5 Oct 2026
APPLIES TO
Non-commercial (free) licences
JURISDICTION
global
HOW IT WAS TAKEN
Fetched from the company
SHA-256
944F7DCD…FE11

How we read it: The Product Data Collection FAQ, version of 16 December 2025, states the other default: under a non-commercial licence, detailed code-related data collection is enabled until you disable it, and the FAQ names the menu path. It is the same setting as the paid tier's, with a different starting position, and what it collects is the full communication with the model. C rather than D because the default is disclosed.

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

Paid and commercial licencesTRAINS: NO
OPT-OUT
Nothing to switch off
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
18 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED
Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW
Unknown
Non-commercial (free) licencesTRAINS: YES
OPT-OUT
Self-serve toggle
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
37 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED
Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW
Unknown

How to opt out of JetBrains AI training

Plan by plan, from what JetBrains's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

Paid and commercial licences

Nothing to switch off: training here is off until an opt-in is given.

Non-commercial (free) licences

Yes. JetBrains has a self-serve setting.

IDE settings
  1. Open Settings, then Appearance & Behavior, System Settings, Data Sharing.
  2. Turn off sending detailed code-related data.
Each step's source and archived copy →

What this policy has done since we started watching

4 CAPTURES SINCE 13 AUG 2026

The record starts here. JetBrains's 4 documents were first captured on 13 Aug 2026, and there's no earlier copy to compare them against, so this verdict has no history behind it yet. From now on every re-read is diffed against those copies, and anything that moves appears here.

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policy
13 Aug 2026
Terms of Servicequoted
10 Sept 2026
AI Addendum
10 Sept 2026
AI Addendumquoted
10 Sept 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

We wrote to JetBrains on 19 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.

Report a wrong clause

Compared with Cursor · Writing about JetBrains? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.