232 APPS TRACKED · 227 CLAUSES ON FILE · 38 WITH NO CLAUSE TO QUOTE
RECORD OPENED 5 OCT 2026 · 1 CLAUSES ON FILE
work

Does Slack train on your data?

Slack does not build generative AI models on your messages, but it does train predictive models on them by default. Opting out means emailing support.

LAST CHECKED
5 Oct 2026 · 5 days ago
CONFIDENCE
high
RIGHT OF REPLY
Asked · no reply
Verdict
D
Trains on you by default

Evidence 1 — All accounts
AI Addendum · All accounts
EVIDENCE 01 OF 01
"If you want to exclude your Customer Data from helping train Slack global models, you can opt out."
CHECKED
24 Aug 2026
STILL LIVE AS OF
5 Oct 2026
APPLIES TO
All accounts
JURISDICTION
global
HOW IT WAS TAKEN
Fetched from the company
SHA-256
5F075D57…0E76

How we read it: Two separate promises, and only one is a no. Slack states plainly that it does not develop generative AI models using Customer Data — a real protection, better than most here. But the same page says predictive models for features like emoji and channel recommendations "analyse Customer Data (e.g. messages, content and files) submitted to Slack", and those are on unless you act. What makes this D rather than C is the exit: not a toggle, but an email from an org or workspace owner to Customer Experience quoting the workspace URL and a set subject line — so an ordinary member cannot opt themselves out at all. None of this is in the privacy policy; it is published only here.

CONTROLS SEARCHED FOR · 24 Aug 2026

opt out, opt-out, object to, settings, toggle, turn off, disable, by default

What the document does offer

  • "If you want to exclude your Customer Data from helping train Slack global models, you can opt out."
  • the route: "please have your Org or Workspace Owners or Primary Owner contact our Customer Experience team at feedback@slack.com with your Workspace/Org URL and the subject line 'Slack Global model opt-out request'"
  • what opting out preserves: "you will still enjoy all of the benefits of our globally trained ML models without contributing to the underlying models"
  • "Slack will not use Customer Data to train generative AI models unless Customer provides affirmative opt-in consent" — a separate and stronger promise, covering generative models only

Why none of it applies: Two promises doing different work. Generative models are opt-in and that is a real protection. Predictive models are opt-out, and the exit is an email from an Org or Workspace Owner quoting a set subject line — so an ordinary member of somebody else's workspace cannot exercise it at all. That is what keeps this at D rather than C: the control exists, is documented precisely, and is out of reach of most of the people it governs.

What each plan can refuse

The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.

All accountsTRAINS: YES
OPT-OUT
Contact support
RETENTION
Not stated
EXPOSURE
55 / 100
DE-IDENTIFIED
Not stated
HUMAN REVIEW
Unknown

How to opt out of Slack AI training

Plan by plan, from what Slack's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.

All accounts

Yes, but not self-serve: Slack makes you contact support.

By email, owners only
  1. Ask a Workspace Owner, Org Owner or the Primary Owner to email feedback@slack.com.
  2. Include the Workspace or Org URL and the subject line "Slack Global model opt-out request".

Owners only; a member can't do this for themselves. Slack says an opted-out workspace keeps the benefit of its global models.

Each step's source and archived copy →

Everything we read

DOCUMENT
CHECKED
SNAPSHOT
Privacy Policy
7 Sept 2026
AI Addendumquoted
24 Aug 2026

Vendor response

From the company? What a reply does and what moves a grade.

We wrote to Slack on 21 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.

Report a wrong clause

Compared with Discord · Writing about Slack? Embed this verdict as a card that stays current.