Does Geekbot train on your data?
Geekbot's AI Policy says it doesn't use team data or user content to train or fine-tune models. Its AI features run on Azure OpenAI, and an administrator can have them turned off.
No opt-out found in this policy
"Geekbot does not use team data or user content to train or fine-tune models for any other purpose."
- 3 Oct 2026
- All accounts
- global
- Fetched from the company
- 5DD05BED…ECBD
How we read it: Re-graded from UNCLEAR on 3 October 2026. The privacy policy never reaches the question; Geekbot's AI Policy, last updated 1 November 2025, does. Section 6, "What Geekbot Does Not Do", says it "does not use team data or user content to train or fine-tune models for any other purpose". The section before limits processing by Azure OpenAI "solely for the purpose of delivering the customer-enabled features of Geekbot", so the other purposes it rules out include training. AI is on by default, which is about processing, not training. B and not A because it's a promise.
What each plan can refuse
The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.
- Nothing to switch off
- Not stated
- 18 / 100
- Not stated
- Unknown
How to opt out of Geekbot AI training
Plan by plan, from what Geekbot's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.
All accounts
Nothing to switch off: Geekbot's policy says training is off here.
What this policy has done since we started watching
The record starts here. Geekbot's 2 documents were first captured on 14 Aug 2026, and there's no earlier copy to compare them against, so this verdict has no history behind it yet. From now on every re-read is diffed against those copies, and anything that moves appears here.
Vendor response
We wrote to Geekbot on 25 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.
Report a wrong clause