Does AlphaSense train on your data?
AlphaSense says it does not train generative models on customer content — with one carve-out: unless the customer agrees otherwise.
No opt-out found in this policy
"We do not use customer personal data, customer-provided content, or personal data processed on behalf of customers to train generally available generative artificial intelligence models or large language models, except where expressly agreed with the customer."
- 14 Aug 2026
- 5 Oct 2026
- All plans
- global
- Fetched from the company
- 947FCB54…A6CA
How we read it: Read the two qualifiers. "Generally available" models are excluded, which leaves customer-specific or internal models unaddressed; and "except where expressly agreed with the customer" means an enterprise buyer can agree to training on behalf of the people whose data it is. For a research platform sold to firms, the person whose data it is and the person who signs the agreement are rarely the same.
What each plan can refuse
The same questions, asked of every plan we could identify. Every cell comes from a quoted clause or a documented search - see the evidence above.
- Nothing to switch off
- Not stated
- 19 / 100
- Not stated
- Unknown
How to opt out of AlphaSense AI training
Plan by plan, from what AlphaSense's own policy says about refusing. Where it publishes the steps, they're listed here with the limits they carry. Where there's nothing to switch off, or nothing graded, this says so instead of inventing a menu path.
All plans
Nothing to switch off: AlphaSense's policy says training is off here.
What this policy has done since we started watching
The record starts here. AlphaSense's policy was first captured on 14 Aug 2026, and there's no earlier copy to compare it against, so this verdict has no history behind it yet. From now on every re-read is diffed against that copy, and anything that moves appears here.
Everything we read
Vendor response
We wrote to AlphaSense on 27 Aug 2026, quoting the clauses above and inviting a correction. Nothing has come back. That's published because a company declining to comment on its own policy is something a reader should know, and because the invitation should be on the record whether or not it's taken up. Any reply goes here, word for word.
Report a wrong clause